It's the wrong question.

Kerr's motion offense — the beautiful, egalitarian system that powered four championships — has looked increasingly stale. Opponents have figured out the reads, the turnovers have piled up, and the results speak for themselves. But swapping out the head coach without a coherent vision for what comes next is just rearranging deck chairs on a very expensive sinking ship.

Here's the real issue: Joe Lacob and GM Mike Dunleavy need to decide what this team actually is. Are we still building around Steph Curry for one last run? Are we pivoting to a youth movement? Are we trying to do both simultaneously, which — spoiler alert — is exactly how you end up as a .451 team that's too good to tank and too flawed to compete?

Reports suggest that if Kerr steps away, the front office will cast a wide net for coaching candidates with diverse backgrounds. Fine. But a new voice only matters if the organizational direction is clear. Hiring an up-tempo analytics darling means nothing if the roster is still constructed for a motion-heavy half-court system. Bringing in a defensive-minded grinder won't help if you're asking him to maximize a 37-year-old point guard's remaining prime.

The offensive system absolutely needs to evolve — 27th in turnovers is indefensible regardless of who's drawing up plays. But evolution requires knowing what you're evolving toward.

San Francisco has invested enormous public goodwill and private capital into this franchise. The luxury tax bills are astronomical. The least Lacob and Dunleavy owe fans is a coherent plan, not just a coaching carousel dressed up as progress.

Make a decision. Commit to it. Then find the coach who fits.

Anything else is just expensive indecision.