A San Francisco house where a family of four died sold in just days after being listed at $1,499,950 — ultimately closing for roughly $2.2 million. That's $700,000 over asking. Four days on the market. In a home where unspeakable tragedy occurred.

Let that sink in.

Now, let's talk about the "over asking" framing for a second, because it deserves scrutiny. As one local pointed out, the $1.5 million list price in a luxury neighborhood where homes are spread far apart was always a strategic lowball — designed to generate buzz, attract multiple offers, and drive a bidding war. Mission accomplished. If the home had been listed at $2.25 million, nobody would be writing headlines about a steal. The "over asking" metric is essentially a marketing trick dressed up as news.

As one SF resident put it bluntly: "We can't even get death discounts on houses anymore."

And they're right. When the tragedy first made headlines, plenty of people half-joked that at least one home in San Francisco might finally be attainable. Turns out the housing market doesn't care about your discomfort — or anyone else's. A 3-bedroom, 2-bath in a desirable neighborhood is a 3-bedroom, 2-bath in a desirable neighborhood, full stop.

This isn't really a story about a haunted house. It's a story about a housing market so broken, so supply-starved, that buyers will sprint past almost any red flag to secure a property. San Francisco has spent decades strangling new construction with zoning restrictions, permitting nightmares, and NIMBY resistance. The result? Demand so far outstrips supply that the circumstances of a sale barely register.

You can't regulate your way to affordability. You can't wish your way there either. You build. Or you keep watching homes — no matter their history — fly off the market for seven figures in under a week.

Sleep tight, renters.