As one local put it, "It's hilarious to me that Chakrabarti has spent millions of dollars of his own money to be tied with … Chan." That about sums it up. When your unlimited campaign budget can't buy you a decisive lead over a relatively low-profile opponent, maybe the product isn't what voters are shopping for.

The canvassing operation has apparently been... aggressive. One SF resident shared that they buzzed someone into their building expecting a UPS delivery, only to find "a pair of Saikat canvassers" at their door. When your campaign strategy is indistinguishable from a package theft scare, you might want to rethink your ground game.

But let's talk about what District 4 voters actually care about. The Sunset and Parkside neighborhoods have been ground zero for quality-of-life frustrations — RV encampments turning residential streets into dumping grounds, property crime, and a city government that seems more interested in managing decline than enforcing basic standards. One resident nailed the core tension: "We should be okay with small RVs and campers, but when the streets become literal dumping yards with rampant drug and bio waste that would warrant huge fines for any other tax-paying citizen, it gets absurd."

That's the fundamental issue. District 4 doesn't need a supervisor who brings Beltway ideology to a neighborhood that wants clean streets, functional transit, and a government that treats taxpayers with the same patience it extends to everyone else. What voters here are saying — loudly — is that they want someone who will enforce the rules equally and stop pretending that accountability is cruelty.

Whoever wins this seat would do well to listen to the neighborhood instead of the national donor class. The Sunset isn't a stepping stone. It's home to people who'd really just like their streets back.