Let's be clear about what happened here: an investigation into alleged sexual assault by out-of-state law enforcement officers landed on the DA's desk, and the office decided not to pursue charges. The details remain murky, but the optics are devastating for an office that was supposed to represent a return to law-and-order credibility after the Chesa Boudin recall.

The problem isn't necessarily the legal merits of this particular case — prosecutors decline cases for legitimate evidentiary reasons all the time. The problem is the pattern. Jenkins was installed in part to restore public trust in the criminal justice system, and that trust requires the appearance — and the reality — of equal application of the law. When cops get a pass that ordinary citizens wouldn't, it corrodes the very foundation she was supposed to rebuild.

As one SF resident put it bluntly: "The whole reason she was hired was so she wouldn't prosecute cops, so she's doing her job." That's cynical, sure. But cynicism is what you get when accountability feels selective.

Here's what fiscal conservatives and liberty-minded folks should understand: government accountability isn't a left-wing talking point. It's the bedrock of limited government. If you believe the state shouldn't have unchecked power over individuals — and we do — then you should be deeply uncomfortable when agents of the state appear to operate above the law. Badge or no badge, the rules apply to everyone. That's not anti-cop; that's pro-Constitution.

Jenkins' office owes the public a thorough, transparent explanation of why this case didn't meet the threshold for prosecution. Not a press release. Not a two-line statement. A real accounting. Because right now, the silence is louder than any charges would have been.

Accountability isn't optional. It's the whole point.