It won't be.

Let's be clear about what we're dealing with here. Becerra was never a member of Scientology. But during his time in Congress, he spoke at multiple Scientology events and actively advocated on the church's behalf. That's not a casual acquaintance — that's a working relationship. You don't show up to multiple events and carry water for an organization in Congress because you got a wrong turn on your way to the Capitol cafeteria.

Now, look — people are allowed to evolve. Politicians especially love to "evolve" right around the time their old positions become liabilities. And to be fair, plenty of elected officials on both sides of the aisle have cozied up to questionable organizations when it was politically convenient. That's the nature of the beast.

But here's what deserves scrutiny: What exactly did Becerra advocate for on Scientology's behalf, and who benefited? The Church of Scientology has spent decades lobbying for favorable tax treatment and legal protections that most organizations — religious or otherwise — could only dream of. If Becerra was part of that machinery, voters and taxpayers deserve a full accounting, not a belated press release expressing disapproval.

The real issue isn't Scientology itself. It's the broader pattern of politicians maintaining convenient alliances until the political math changes, then acting shocked — shocked — that anyone would associate them with their own record. Accountability means owning what you did and explaining why, not just rebranding when the winds shift.

We'd respect the rebuke a lot more if it came with a receipt of honesty instead of a whiff of damage control.