There's a cottage industry in Bay Area sports media dedicated to speculating about Steve Kerr's future with the Warriors. Every dip in the standings, every puzzling rotation decision, every time the team looks mortal — the hot takes fly. Is Kerr's time up? Has the game passed him by?

Let's take a breath.

Draymond Green — who, love him or hate him, has more rings than most franchises — recently put it plainly: "The answer around here when it comes to winning has never not been Steve Kerr." That's a double negative, but the point is crystal clear. The man has four championships. Four. In nine seasons. In the modern NBA, that's not a coaching tenure — it's a dynasty.

The reality is that Kerr's position rests on three pillars that aren't going anywhere: Steph Curry's endorsement, Joe Lacob's willingness to write enormous checks, and a track record that speaks for itself. You can quibble about individual game decisions — and Warriors fans absolutely will — but the macro picture is hard to argue with.

Here's where our fiscal conservative instincts kick in: stability has value. Coaching carousels are expensive, disruptive, and rarely produce better outcomes than sticking with a proven commodity. Look around the league at teams cycling through coaches every two years, hemorrhaging money on buyouts and rebuilding "culture" from scratch. That's the organizational equivalent of government waste — spending more to get less because you got bored with what was working.

The Warriors aren't a championship lock this year. They might not be next year either. But blowing up a coaching situation that has produced historic success because of a rough stretch would be the kind of short-term panic move that San Francisco's city government would make — and we've seen how that works out.

Sometimes the boring answer is the right one. Keep Kerr. Let Curry lead. Stop looking for problems where they don't exist.