Let's be blunt about what's happening here. San Francisco's public school district has been hemorrhaging students for years. Enrollment has plummeted. Buildings sit half-empty while the district burns through money keeping the lights on in classrooms with a dozen kids in them. Everyone — parents, teachers, budget analysts — knows that consolidation isn't just smart policy, it's mathematical inevitability. You can't run a district designed for 60,000 students when fewer than 50,000 show up.

So what did SFUSD do? They hired someone to rip off the Band-Aid. And instead, the Band-Aid is still firmly in place, gathering lint.

The enrollment overhaul — the system that was supposed to replace San Francisco's legendarily confusing school assignment process — is now years behind schedule. And because the closures were supposed to follow the new enrollment map, those are stuck in limbo too. It's a bureaucratic traffic jam where nothing moves because everything depends on something else that also isn't moving.

Here's what taxpayers need to understand: every month of delay costs real money. Empty classrooms still need maintenance. Underenrolled schools still need administrators. The district is spending dollars it doesn't have on infrastructure it doesn't need, and the person hired to stop the bleeding is still studying the wound.

This isn't a critique of Su personally — school closures are politically radioactive, and every neighborhood fights to keep its local school open. But that's exactly why the board hired a leader: to make the decisions that are painful but necessary. Leadership isn't a study group.

SFUSD's students deserve a district that works. Its taxpayers deserve a budget that adds up. Right now, they're getting neither — just more delays, more meetings, and more of the status quo that got us here in the first place.