San Francisco police are investigating a burst of weekend gunfire that damaged cars and homes — and if that sentence doesn't make you do a double-take, you've been living here too long.

Let that sink in: bullets hit homes. Not an abandoned lot, not a deserted stretch of highway at 3 a.m. — residential property where people sleep, eat dinner, and try to raise families. Cars caught rounds too, because apparently nothing says "world-class city" like checking your windshield for bullet holes on a Monday morning.

The incidents appear centered in the Western Addition, a neighborhood that has long struggled with cycles of violence despite decades of city promises and millions in spending aimed at community safety. As one local resident put it bluntly, the location wasn't exactly a surprise — pointing to the Buchanan Mall stretch as a known trouble spot.

And that's the real indictment here. When residents can practically predict where the next shooting will happen, it means the city's strategy — whatever it is this quarter — isn't working. We pour money into violence prevention programs, restorative justice initiatives, and "community ambassadors," and yet people are still dodging bullets on a Saturday night.

Look, nobody is asking for a police state. But the basic social contract is pretty simple: you pay your taxes, and the government keeps you reasonably safe in your own home. When stray rounds are punching through siding in a residential neighborhood, that contract is broken.

What we need is accountability. Which programs are actually reducing gun violence, and which are just expensive line items on a supervisor's press release? Where are the police patrols? What's the clearance rate on shootings in Western Addition? These are basic questions that deserve real answers — not platitudes about "root causes" while someone's Honda Civic gets ventilated.

San Franciscans deserve to feel safe on their own block. That shouldn't be a controversial opinion.