If you've picked up the Sunset Beacon or Richmond Review lately, you've probably encountered Kopp's regular commentary column, which reads like a seismograph for a very specific slice of San Francisco grievance politics. The latest tempest involves District 4 candidate Natalie Gee, whom Kopp apparently took issue with for — and this is rich — accepting an endorsement from someone she doesn't fully agree with. In politics. Where coalition-building is literally the entire job.

The irony deepens when you recall that back in March, Kopp threw his weight behind Connie Chan's congressional bid, seemingly motivated by Chan's ongoing opposition to the voter-approved Sunset Dunes Park. So let's get this straight: a democratic election produces a result Kopp doesn't like, and suddenly the candidate fighting that result gets his gold star? That's not principled conservatism. That's just contrarianism with a mailing address.

As one local put it: "Wow. I did not know QK was still among us." He is, and he's still picking fights.

Meanwhile, Gee appears to be the D4 candidate actually willing to do the unsexy work — stop signs, crosswalk striping, basic road safety. As one SF resident noted, she's "the only D4 contender that's not afraid to put in a stop sign or stripe a crosswalk," which shouldn't be a radical position but somehow is in this city.

Here's our unsolicited advice for June and November: pull up Kopp's endorsement list, study it carefully, and then do the opposite. Not out of spite — out of pattern recognition. When someone consistently backs candidates who fight voter-approved projects and throws fits over normal political endorsements, they've stopped being a guide and started being a warning label.

Fiscal responsibility and good governance aren't about personalities or grudges. They're about results. And right now, the Kopp Inverse Voting Guide has a better track record than the man himself.