Here's the thing about District 4: it's one of the safest neighborhoods in one of the safest major cities in America. That's not a knock — it's a compliment. The Sunset is the kind of place where people actually want to raise families, where homes sell in days (even the ones with, shall we say, complicated histories), and where the biggest daily grievance is probably fog and parking. It's a genuine success story in a city that has precious few of them.

So naturally, the candidates are running like the neighborhood is on fire.

The early campaign posturing has been heavy on re-litigating political battles that are already settled and drumming up crime panic in a district where the data simply doesn't support the hysteria. It's a familiar playbook: find what scares people, amplify it, and hope nobody checks the receipts.

Look — wanting safe streets and responsive policing is perfectly reasonable. Nobody is arguing otherwise. But when candidates treat a low-crime neighborhood like a war zone to score political points, it insults the intelligence of the voters who actually live there. District 4 residents aren't dumb. They know what their neighborhood looks like when they walk outside.

As one local put it: "Some of us just want the park to be fully resourced with enough bathrooms. Which candidates support that?" Exactly. The mundane stuff — functional parks, clean streets, sensible zoning — is what actually moves the needle on quality of life. It's just not as sexy as a campaign mailer about a crime wave that doesn't exist.

What District 4 deserves is a supervisor who will fight for fiscal sanity, push back on City Hall's addiction to spending without outcomes, and focus on the boring-but-essential work of making city services actually function. What it's probably going to get is months of performative outrage and yard sign warfare.

We'll be watching. Bring popcorn.